In the interview I have posted above, Bob Costas does an excellent job at putting Jerry Sandusky on the spot about his alleged crimes. The interview was, on NBC's part, brilliantly unplanned, so as to cause Sandusky to have to speak his own words, and not read from a premeditated and scripted answer sheet, which I'm sure given the time to prepare for such an interview, he would have undoubtedly been in possession of. The most self incriminating moments of the interview, for those of you who don't wish to sit through the entire 9 minutes, are about the first 3 1/2 minutes, then again starting up at exactly 7:10 near the end of the video. Please, take the time to actually listen to Sandusky's scattered, and delayed responses to Bob Costas' questions.
Having listened to his responses to the straight forward, no nonsense questions asked by Costas, is there any doubt in your mind of this man's guilt? A man who openly admits to showering with young boys, touching them on the leg, horse playing around while naked in the shower, all actions of which were of course meant in a non-sexual manner. Really? You're telling me that we, as intelligent, American people, who live in a country where child molestation is considered even more of a horrendous act than murder, are supposed to just wave it off and say, "Oh it's okay. He said the naked towel slapping on the boy's asses was in no way intended to come off as sexual contact."
For me, this kind of statement, where a grown man admits to touching, and hugging, and showering with young boys after "workouts," is an admission of guilt. However, with the jaw dropping, utterly unbelievable failure in our nation's Judicial System in recent years, these kind of comments could be completely overlooked. Just look again at the constant lies and deceiving statements from Casey Anthony during the investigation of her daughters murder, all pointing towards a cover up, that the jury seemed to have not been informed of in as much detail as the rest of the country. Or, on a more subject related note, how the jury in the Michael Jackson child molestation trial completely disregarded the fact that a 45 year old man admittedly shared his bed with children ranging in ages of 9-13 years of age, one victim of which, was somehow able to provide a vivid enough description of MJ's genitals, apparently noting certain noticeable marks or moles, that a warrant was issued for collection of photos of his genitals, resulting in a perfect match. Amazing how 12 people could find him innocent of molesting children with such evidence......TWICE(1993 being the first child molestation charge), but still so many in this country or going "Nuh Uh!! Just listen to how good his music is, he couldn't have done that.
Now, back to the man in question, Jerry Sandusky. The man just seems to have the classic, stereotypical Meagan's Law face, that just screams pedophile. The one that happens to be the nice old man living next door, that's always so friendly, and loves to give your children candy and lemonade. Until one day you just get bored and decide to do some neighborhood snooping online, and realize that good old Mr. Nelson next door, is a convicted child molester. If you haven't yet checked out the Meagan's Law website yourself, I suggest you do yourself a favor and give it a visit. You would be shocked at what type of sick fucks live just a block away from your house.
Even more shocking than the allegations against Jerry Sandusky, are the countless amount of Penn State employees and football coaching staff, including the late head coach Joe Peterno's knowledge Jerry Sandusky's actions over the course of his coaching career. What makes things even more disturbing, is the fact that Jerry Sandusky was the director of a young boys activities club during these years. Take a wild guess where the supposed victims originated from. Yup, you guessed it(if you actually attempted to make a guess. haha), from Mr. Sandusky's club itself.......Strange.
Jerry Sandusky and his lawyer, are now asking for the courts permission to allow Sandusky the right to have supervised visitation with his young grandchildren. As I said before, there is not a snowball's chance in hell that, if I were the judge ruling over this case, that this man would be able to ever set foot withing a mile of his grandchildren, supervised or not, for as long as I had the power to do so. His grandchildren have been told their entire lives, that their grandfather loves them, and would protect them, and they, being impressionable young children, have most likely fallen into that trap, set by their grandfather. I would like to know, if these children have been made aware of the accusations against their loving grandfather. I'd be willing to bet the answer to that question is no, they haven't.
So what do you think? Is he guilty? Should he be able to see his grandchildren? As our Judicial System states, all defendants are Innocent Until Proven Guilty. Which is absolute bullshit. It should be Guilty Until Proven Innocent, because if they were innocent, then they wouldn't even be charged with any crime in the first place. Right?